Fictionally Flipping Tetrominoes? Defining the Fictionality of a Videogame Player’s Actions
In this paper, I use the case of player actions in Tetris to explore possible problems in existing descriptions of videogame actions as fictional actions. Both in the philosophy of computer games and videogame studies, authors often make use of Kendall Walton’s make-believe theory to describe videogame actions as fictional. According to the Waltonian description of fictional actions, however, the actions players perform when playing Tetris, such as flipping tetrominoes, would also be fictional. This is a counterintuitive idea, as players of Tetris seem to be really manipulating the graphical shapes in this game. I will thus discuss two other possible descriptions of fictional actions hinted at by Grant Tavinor (2009). Firstly, the (non-)fictional status of videogame actions might depend on the nature of the affordances to which they are reactions. Secondly, it might be the case that the player must take on a role in the fictional world for her action to be fictional. In the end, I will combine this second idea with a Waltonian description of fictional actions to form a new description of fictional actions that corresponds to and explains videogame players’ experiences.
K Games (2007). Bioshock. PlayStation 3.
Rockstar Games (2008). Grand Theft Auto IV. PlayStation 3.
BioWare (2007). Mass Effect. Xbox 360.
Monolith Productions (2014). Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor. PlayStation 4.
Pajitnov, Alexey and Gerasimov, Vadim (1985). Tetris. PC.
The Sims. 2000. Maxis, PC.
Naughty Dog (2007). Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune. PlayStation 3.
Psygnosis (1995). WipeOut. PlayStation.
Bateman, C. (2011). Imaginary Games. John Hunt Publishing.
Juul, J. (2005). Half-Real: Videogames between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT press.
Matsunaga, S. (2016). Did You Really Get a Mushroom? Player’s Fictional Actions in Videogame Playing. Aesthetics, 20, 89-102.
Robson, J. and A. Meskin. (2012a). Videogames and the First Person. In Mimesis: Metaphysics, Cognition, Pragmatics, edited by G. Currie, P. Kotako, and M. Pokorny. College Publications.
—. (2012b). Fiction and Fictional Worlds in Videogames. In The Philosophy of Computer Games, edited by J. R. Sageng, H. Fossheim, and T. Mandt Larsen. Springer Science & Business Media.
—. (2016). Videogames as Self-Involving Interactive Fictions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(2), 165-177.
Sageng, J. R. (2012). In-Game Action. In The Philosophy of Computer Games, edited by J. R. Sageng, H. Fossheim, and T. Mandt Larsen. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tavinor, G. (2005). Videogames and Interactive Fiction. Philosophy and Literature, 29(1), 24-40.
—. (2008). Definition of Videogames. Contemporary Aesthetics, 6. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=492. Accessed on 20/02/2018.
—. (2009). The Art of Videogames. John Wiley & Sons.
Thabet, T. (2017). Game Studies All Over the Place: Video Games and Gamer Identities. SciELO - EDUEL.
Velleman, J. D. (2008). Bodies, selves. American Imago, 65(3), 405-426.
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press.
—. (2013). Fictionality and Imagination Reconsidered. In From Fictionalism to Realism, edited by C. Barbero, M. Ferraris, and A. Voltolini. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright in their articles and grant the Journal of the Philosophy of Games (JPG) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the following licence: Creative Commons Licence : CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The licence allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal, but does not allow others to create derivative works based on the work without the author’s permission.
- Authors are allowed to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that such distribution includes an acknowledgement of the article’s initial publication in JPG.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Authors who distribute their work after its acceptance by JPG but prior to its publication agree to indicate on the manuscript that it will be published in JPG. Authors agree that they will not publish their work in any other journals, anthologies, or monographs before the date on which their work is published by JPG.
- Authors grant JPG a royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide license to create derivative works based on their articles and to publish their articles or any part of their articles in compilations and anthologies.
In special cases, it may be possible for the author to negotiate an open licence other than the CC BY-NC-ND.