An Analysis of Participation, Identity Conversations, and Social Networking Affordances on an Online Social Network for Children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5617/jmi.v3i1.2516Keywords:
Social networking, Child-computer interaction, Human-computer interaction, Identity explorationAbstract
In this study, we explore the behaviors of children ages 7 to 12 years on our custom social network, KidGab, to understand the activities that increase participation and identity-related conversation. We specifically study the effects of two social networking affordances provided by KidGab: a suite of personality quizzes and a badge-based participatory reward system. Both affordances harness the preadolescent’s internal focus on identity exploration. We analyzed KidGab’s activity logs in an attempt to understand the relationships between activities on these affordances and other engagement measured on the site (e.g., the total posts authored on KidGab per day, total comments authored per day, likes per day, etc.). We also investigate the amount of conversation relating to identity that accompanies quizzes and badges. We found that taking quizzes and posting results had a higher positive correlation with online participation on KidGab than attempting to earn badges. Our results suggest that, though youth are interested in self-reflecting via textual compositions, on a daily basis they partake more in personality-quiz-style activities that provide them instant feedback and shared experiences with other users.
References
Abeyrathne, D., Morisawa, Y., Edirisinghe, C., Ranasinghe, N., Karunanayaka, K., Zhu, K., & Lan, L. (2011). Connected online and offline safe social networking for children. Computers in Entertainment, 9(2), 1–8. doi:10.1145/1998376.1998380
Addison, J., & Comstock, M. (1998). Virtually out: The emergence of a lesbian, bisexual, and gay youth cyberculture. In J. Austin, & M. Willard (Eds.), Generations of Youth: Youth Cultures and History in Twentieth Century America (pp. 367–378). New York, NY: NYU Press.
Antin, J., & Churchill, E. F. (2011, May). Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings (pp. 1-4). Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/03-Antin-Churchill.pdf
Bauman, S., & Tatum, T. (2009). Web sites for young children: Gateway to online social networking?. Professional School Counseling, 13(1), 1-10. doi:10.5330/psc.n.2010-13.1
Bauman, Z., & Vecchi, B. (2008). Identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
boyd, d. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. In E. Dykstra-Erickson, & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems - CHI ‚04, (pp. 1279-1282). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/985921.986043
boyd, d. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., & Stata, R. et al. (2000). Graph structure in the Web. Computer Networks, 33(1-6), 309-320. doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(00)00083-9
Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, L., & Çallı, L. (2014). Personality types and Facebook advertising: An exploratory study. Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 15(4), 327-336. doi:10.1057/dddmp.2014.25
Clarke, B. (2009). Friends forever: How young adolescents use social-networking sites. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(6), 22-26. doi:10.1109/mis.2009.114
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82. doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047585.06264.cc
Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. (2000). Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59-83. doi:10.1145/344949.345004
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Goodstein, A. (2007). Totally Wired. New York, NY: Saint Martin‘s Griffin.
Halavais, A., Kwon, K., Havener, S., & Striker, J. (2014). Badges of Friendship: Social Influence and Badge Acquisition on Stack Overflow. In R. H. Sprague, Jr (Ed.), Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1607-1615). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.206
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2009). Bullying beyond the Schoolyard. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Inkpen, K., Du, H., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., & Johns, P. (2012). Video kids: augmenting close friendships with asynchronous video conversations in VideoPal. In E. H. Chi, & K. Höök (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‚12 (pp. 2387-2396), New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208400
Itō, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Joshi, A., & Walsh, G. (2011). Twooter: Designing a musical expression tool for use in social networks. In S. Price (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC ‚11 (pp. 169-172), New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1999030.1999053
Kekelis, L., Ancheta, R., & Heber, E. (2005). Hurdles in the pipeline: Girls and technology careers. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 26(1), 99-109. doi:10.1353/fro.2005.0013
Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22-S30. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., & Tomkins, A. (1999). Trawling the Web for emerging cyber-communities. Computer Networks, 31(11-16), 1481-1493. doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00040-7
Larson, R. (1995). Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents‘ private use of media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(5), 535-550. doi:10.1007/bf01537055
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in Schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157-170. doi:10.1177/0143034306064547
Mazzarella, S. (2010). Girl Wide Web 2.0: Revisiting Girls, the Internet, and the Negotiation of Identity. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Näsänen, J., Oulasvirta, A., & Lehmuskallio, A. (2009). Mobile media in the social fabric of a kindergarten. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‚09 (pp. 2167-2176), New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1518701.1519031
O‘Keeffe, G., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054
Posey, J. (2002). They Call Me Kendra: A Crimefighter’s Personal Story and Battle Against Online Pedophiles. Culver City, CA: ProStar Publications, Inc.
Rideout, V. (2015). The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens (Tech. Rep.). San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens
Ringrose, J. (2010) Sluts, whores, fat slags and Playboy bunnies: Teen girls’ negotiations of ‘sexy’ on social networking sites and at school. In C. Jackson, C. Paechter, & E. Renold (Eds.), Girls and Education 3-16: Continuing Concerns, New Agendas (pp. 170-182). Basingstoke, England: Open University Press.
Stern, S. (2008) Producing Sites, Exploring Identities: Youth Online Authorship. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 95-117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sullivan, D. (2008, January 14). Web 2.0 identity theft. Message posted to http://www.realtimewebsecurity.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/593.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Valentine, S., Leyva-McMurtry, A., Borgos-Rodriguez, K., & Hammond, T. (2016). The digital Sash: A sketch-based badge system in a social network for children. In T. Hammond, S. Valentine, & A. Adler (Eds.), Revolutionizing Education with Digital Ink. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Wang, J., Iannotti, R., & Nansel, T. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368-375. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
Wärnestål, P., & Nygren, J. (2013). Building an experience framework for a digital peer support service for children surviving from cancer. In N. Sawhney, & E. Reardon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC ‚13. doi:10.1145/2485760.2485794
Willett, R. (2008). Consumer citizens online: Structure, agency, and gender in online participation. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 49-69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Willett, R., Robinson, M., & Marsh, J. (2009). Play, Creativity and Digital Cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.
Winn, M. (2012). Promote Digital Citizenship through School-Based Social Networking. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(4), 10-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
