Business models for academic prototypes: A new approach to media innovation
This article introduces the concept of academic prototypes, and shows how they can lead to technological innovation in journalism. We propose an innovation method that transforms a value-oriented academic prototype into a market-oriented journalistic service. The principles for product development presented here are based on the lean startup method as well as business model canvassing. A prototype scenario shows how the locative information app PediaCloud could be transformed into a locative news service for a regional newspaper in Western Norway. Ideally, the academic prototype will be transformed into a novel and engaging way of reading news stories, and a profitable solution for the newspaper. Realistically, the team will have acquired empirical validation of the business model's strong and weak points. In the conclusion, we summarize the utility of the approach for validated learning, and make recommendations for further research on innovation with academic prototypes.
Brock, G. (2013). Out of Print. Newspapers, journalism and the business of news in the digital age. London: KoganPage.
Bakker, P. (2013). Measuring Innovation. Successes and Failures in a Newspaper Market. In T. Storsul and A. Krumsvik (eds.). Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change (pp. 161-174). Gøteborg: NORDICOM.
Canvanizer (2015). Brainstorming: Business model canvas vs lean canvas. Retrieved from https://canvanizer.com/how-to-use/business-model-canvas-vs-lean-canvas
Christensen, C., Skok D. & Allworth, J. (2012). Breaking News. Mastering the art of disruptive innovation in journalism. Nieman Reports. Retrieved from http://niemanreports.org/articles/breaking-news/.
Blank, S. (2010). What's a startup? First principles. Blog post at steveblank.com, January 25, 2010. Retrieved from http://steveblank.com/2010/01/25/whats-a-startup-first-principles/.
D'Este, P., Guy, F. and Iammarino, S. (2013) Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter? J Econ Geogr 13 (4): 537-558
Economisti Associati (2011). Feasibility study for the preparatory action "ERASMUS for journalists". Part 2 - Statistical Review. Final report to The European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/erjo_part2_report.pdf.
Ekdale, B., Tully, M. Harmsen, S. & Singer, J. (2015). Newswork within a culture of job insecurity: producing news amidst organizational and industry uncertainty. In Journalism Practice, 9(3): 383-398.
Fang, L. (2015). Do Clusters Encourage Innovation? A Meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(3):239-260.
Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the Literature. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, p 1-26.
Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. In Journal of Documentation 59 (3):321-340.
Gynnild, A. (2013). Journalism innovation leads to innovation journalism: the impact of computational exploration on changing mindsets. Journalism. Vol. 15(6): 713-730.
Hevner, A. and Chatterjee, S. Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer, New York, 2010.
Kawasaki, G. (2015). The meaning of meaning. Blog post at guykawasaki.com. March 1st, 2015. Retrieved from http://guykawasaki.com/the-meaning-of-meaning/.
Leurdijk, A., M. Slot, & Nieuwenhuis, O. (2012). Statistical, Ecosystems and Competitiveness Analysis of the Media and Content Industries: The Newspaper Publishing Industry. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS). Retrieved from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=5380.
Maiden, N., Zachos, K., Lockerbie, J., Brock, G. and Traver, C. (2016). Developing and Evaluating Digital Creativity Support in Google Docs for Journalists. 30th British Human Computer Interaction Conference, 11 Jul 2016, Bournemouth.
Maurya, A. (2010). Running Lean. In Science of Aging Knowledge Environment No. 20: 1–278.
McQuivey, J. (2013). Digital Disruption. Unleashing the Next Wave of Innovation. Las Vegas: Forrester Research.
Miller, T. L., Grimes, M., Mcmullen, J. & Vogus, T. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. in Academy of Management Review 37(4): 616–640.
Morlandstø, L. & Krumsvik, A. (eds.) (2014): Innovasjon og verdiskaping i lokale medier. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Nyre, L. (2009). Normative media research. Moving from the ivory tower to the control room. Nordicom Review, 30(2), 3-17.
Nyre, L. (2010). Experimenting with new media for journalism. Nordicom Information 32(2-3): 83-93.
Nyre, L. (2014). Media design method. Combining media studies with design science to make new media. Journal of Media Innovations, 1(1).
Nyre, L. (2015). Akademiske prototypar. Ei retning for medieutviklinga på Vestlandet (pp. 165-181) in Bjerke, P., Lewe, T., Sivertsen, E., Strøm, G. og Werenskjold, R. (eds.) Festskrift for Sverre Liestøl. Oslo: Forlag 1.
Osterwalder, A. (2004). The Business Model Ontology. A proposition in a design science approach. Doctoral thesis at the University of Lausanne. Retrived from http://www.hec.unil.ch/aosterwa/PhD/Osterwalder_PhD_BM_Ontology.pdf.
Osterwalder, A.& Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Start-Up - How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. New York: Penguin.
Rivadeneira, A. W., Gruen, D. Muller, M. & Millen, D. (2007). Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA.
Ruttmann, R. (2012). Investing for Impact: How social entrepreneurship is redefining the meaning of return. Report by Credit Suisse Research Institute and Schwab Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/schwabfound/Investing_for_Impact.pdf
Ruud, G. T. (2014). Journalistiske entreprenører. Medienes krise - din mulighet. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode (pp. 39-61). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Sinozic,T & Tödtling, F. (2015) Adaptation and Change in Creative Clusters: Findings from Vienna's New Media Sector. European Planning Studies 23(10):1975-1992.
Sjøvaag, H. (2014). Homogenisation or differentiation? The effects of consolidation in the regional newspaper market. In Journalism Studies 15(5): 511-521.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42: 1568-1580.
Storsul, T. & Krumsvik, A. (2013). Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change. Gøteborg: Nordicom.
Sørensen, K. (2010). Det norske samfunn - et innovasjonssystem? i Frønes, I. & Kjølsrød, L. (eds.) (2010) Det norske samfunn. 6. utgave. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Tessem, B., Karlsen, S. & Nyre, L. (2016). Mobilen som distribusjonskanal for hyperlokale nyheiter. NOKOBIT 2016.
Tessem, B. Bjørnestad, S., Chen, W. & Nyre. L. (2015). Word cloud visualisation of locative information. Journal of Location-based Services, 9(4): 254-272.
Trappel, J. (2015). What to study when studying media and communication innovation? Research design for the digital age. Journal of Media Innovations, 2(1): 7-22.
Vaagan, R. & Barland, J. (eds) (2015): Entreprenørskap og ledelse i media. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Vranica, S. (2014). TV Ad Dollars Slowly Shifting to Web Video. Wall Street Journal, May 12, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303851804579558091795473048
Westlund, O. & Krumsvik, A. H. (2014). Perceptions of intra-organizational collaboration and media workers' interests in media innovations. In the Journal of Media Innovations 1(2): 52-75.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).