An Audience Perspective on the 2nd Screen Phenomenon
AbstractSecond screen (2nd screen) applications are among the latest of the TV-industry’s innovations to retain the TV-viewer’s attention in a challenging multi-screen environment. These applications can be regarded as an extension of TV-content consumed on a TV-set towards lightweight portable devices such as tablets. Despite the numerous commercial instances available internationally and the existing literature on the topic from a technical perspective remains the audience side of this phenomenon underexposed. Moreover, in the case of Flanders, 2nd screen applications are thus far rather marginally commercially implemented. In this research, we aim to elicit what TV-viewers anticipations are regarding 2nd screen functionalities. By applying means-end theory and a laddering approach we were able to discern how these anticipations subsequently relate to the TV-show itself, the consequences for the viewing experience, as well as how 2nd screen is expected to fit within the viewer’s everyday life.
Amaury Sport Organisation. (2013). iPhone, iPad and Android official apps. Retrieved from http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2013/us/mobile-tablet-applications.html
Bleumers, L., Van den Broeck, W., Lievens, B., & Pierson, J. (2012). Seeing the bigger picture: a user perspective on 360° TV. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive TV and video (pp. 115–124). Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325640
Brooker, W. (2001). Living on Dawson’s Creek Teen viewers, cultural convergence, and television overflow. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 456–472. Retrieved from http://ics.sagepub.com/content/4/4/456.short
Cesar, P., Bulterman, D. C. A., & Jansen, A. J. (2008). Usages of the Secondary Screen in an Interactive Television Environment: Control, Enrich, Share, and Transfer Television Content. In Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Changing Television Environments. Salzburg, Austria.
Courtois, C., & D’heer, E. (2012). Second screen applications and tablet users: constellation, awareness, experience, and interest. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive TV and video (pp. 153–156). Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325646
De Meulenaere, J., Van den Broeck, W., & Lievens, B. (2012). From Era of Plenty to Era of Overflow What Shall I Watch? Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(4), 305–321 .
Disney. (2014). Disney Second Screen. Retrieved from https://disneysecondscreen.go.com/bambi/help.php
Een. (2014). Vernieuwde App van Dagelijkse Kost. Retrieved from http://www.een.be/programmas/dagelijkse-kost/dagelijkse-kost-krijgt-eigen-app
European Broadcasting Union. (2007). Escort: EBU System of Classification of RTV Programmes (Technical Report).
European Broadcasting Union. (2013). Eurovision Song Contest: The Official App. Retrieved from http://www.eurovision.tv/static/app/index.html
Flanders Classics NV. (2014). Download hier de gratis Flanders Classics - Proximus App. Retrieved from http://app.flandersclassics.be/
Geerts, D., Cesar, P., & Bulterman, D. (2008). The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video (pp. 71–80). Silicon Valley, CA: ACM.
Google. (2012, August). The New Multi‐screen World: Understanding Cross-platform Consumer Behavior. U.S.A.
Grandio, M., & Bonaut, J. (2012). Transmedia audiences and television fiction: A comparative approach between Skins (UK) and El Barco (Spain). Participations, Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 9(2), 585 – 574.
Grunert, K. G., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2005). Explaining choice option attractiveness by beliefs elicited by the laddering method. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(2), 223–241. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487004000480
Hawley, M. (2009, July 6). Laddering: A Research Interview Technique for Uncovering Core Values. UX matters. Retrieved February 20, 2014, from http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/07/laddering-a-research-interview-technique-for-uncovering-core-values.php
iMinds-iLab.o. (2013). Digimeter report 6, adoption and usage of media & ICT in Flanders wave 6 (Aug - Sept 2013). Gent: iMinds.
Internet Advertising Bureau. (2012). 2012 Annual Report (p. 40). Internet Advertising Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_AR13_v10c.pdf
Jans, G., & Calvi, L. (2006). Using laddering and association techniques to develop a user-friendly mobile (city) application. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET (pp. 1956–1965).
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture : where old and new media collide. New York (N.Y.): New York University Press.
Little, D. (1991). Rational-Choice Models and Asian Studies. The Journal of Asian Studies, 50(01), 35–52. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0021911800045630
Murray, J. H., Goldenberg, S., Agarwal, K., Chakravorty, T., Cutrell, J., Doris-Down, A., & Kothandaraman, H. (2012). Story-Map: iPad Companion for Long Form TV Narratives. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Changing Television Environments . Berlin, Germany.
SBS Belgium. (2014a). Vier Nu. Vier Nu. Retrieved from http://nu.vier.be/
SBS Belgium. (2014b). Vijf Nu. Vijf Nu. Retrieved from http://nu.vijf.be/
Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of advertising research, 28(1), 11–31. Retrieved from http://belkcollegeofbusiness.uncc.edu/jaredhansen/teaching/mba%20marketing%20research/ladderingtheoy.doc
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179–183.
Subramony, D. (2002). Introducing a “Means-End” Approach to Human-Computer Interaction: Why Users Choose Particular Web Sites Over Others. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002 (pp. 1886–1891). Denver, Colorado.
The 2nd Screen Society. (2012). Lexicon for the 2nd Screen Society. Retrieved February 17, 2014, from http://www.2ndscreensociety.com/lexicon/#SecondScreen
Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., & Hill, A. (2011). Investigating media use and the television user experience in the home. Entertainment Computing, 2(3), 151–161. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2011.02.002
Tvtag. (2014). tvtag – the place to be while watching TV. Retrieved from http://tvtag.com/about?tvtag_redirect=true
Vanden Abeele, V., & Zaman, B. (2009). Laddering the User Experience! Presented at the INTERACT edition:12th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 24-28 August 2009.
Van den Broeck, W., Bauwens, J., & Pierson, J. (2011). The promises of IDTV: between push marketing and consumer needs. Telematics and Informatics, 28(4), 230 – 238.
Viggle Inc. (2014). About Viggle. Viggle. Retrieved from http://get.viggle.com/about/about-us/
Walley, N. (2012, November). Second Screen Master class. Presented at the Presentation at the 4th Future TV Advertising Forum, London, UK.
Zaman, B. (2008). Introducing contextual laddering to evaluate the likeability of games with children. Cognition, Technology and Work, 10(2), 107–117.
Zeebox. (2014). Zeebox is your TV sidekick. Retrieved from http://zeebox.com/welcome
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).