CFP Special Issue: Security and Morality - Critical Anthropological Perspectives


Following the Security and Morality: Critical Anthropological Perspectives conference organized by the EASA Anthropology of Security Network at the University of Oslo in March 2019, the open-access peer-reviewed Journal of Extreme Anthropology has decided to dedicate a special issue to the topic, with a planned publication date of April 2020. The special issue will be jointly edited by Tereza Kuldova & Jardar Østbø. 


While some of the conference participants have expressed their interest in contributing already, the Journal of Extreme Anthropology invites additional papers (please refer to the CFP below), and submissions in different formats: articles, essays, book reviews, photo essays, and experimental submissions. Those who did not attend the conference and are interested in submitting a paper should send an abstract of 250 words to the editor-in-chief at: by 15th of May 2019. Submission date for the issue and those whose abstracts have been accepted will be: 31st October 2019. Articles are published Online First, and may thus appear individually prior to the full issue. For more, please refer to the journal website or get in touch with the editor-in-chief.


Security and Morality: Critical Anthropological Perspectives

Security is omnipresent in today’s politics and media; we are bombarded with images and narratives of proliferating internal and external security threats, conflicts, destabilization of international relations, chaos, and disorder. Many of these striking cultural products of the current politics of fear serve to legitimize new modes of surveillance, expansions of military and other policies in the name of security. ‘Anthropology’s concern with global/local articulations as well as its case-study approach, cross-cultural comparative engagement, and emphasis on the intersections of discourse and practice in specific historicized contexts … uniquely position anthropology to contribute to a critical study of security’ (Goldstein 2010: 489). But anthropology also has a solid track record in dealing with issues of morality and ethics, especially over the last decade and is thus well suited to critically engage with the intersections of morality and security.


Moral discourses are often mobilized to justify new security measures or legitimize increased spending on defense, while themselves predicated upon on implicit moral judgements. And yet, questions of morality have been conspicuously left out as a clear object of analysis in respect to the study of security and securitization by anthropologists, despite the aforementioned strong tradition of ‘anthropology of moralities’ (Mattingly and Throop 2018). The language of morality, as much as real ethical and moral dilemmas, influences and shape the realities on ground, political rhetoric in respect to security, and international legal thinking and relations; even if we may wonder about the degree to which ‘politicians may hijack the language of morality, while ceding very little, if anything, to its substance’ (Fisher 2013). Therefore, it is necessary to think not only critically, but also more systematically about the relation between morality and security. No less so in our own discipline, some of which has been ‘weaponized’ by military and intelligence agencies and adapted to counterinsurgency and asymmetrical warfare, thus raising questions about anthropology’s very own code of ethics (Price 2011). This special issue sets out to investigate (1) the significance of diverse moral legitimizations and constructions of moral authority in security discourses and practices, (2) the lived experiences of morality and ethics related to security (Feldman 2016), (3) different forms of ‘securitization of moral values’ (Østbø 2017), and (4) the ethical problems related to anthropologists’ own involvement in security institutions and to the larger structures of funding of anthropological research for security.


Submissions exploring the following topics are welcome:

  • legitimization and justification of extraordinary security measures through moral discourses

  • moral legitimacy and the logic of ‘security threats’

  • conflicting moralities and ethics in security practices

  • moral authority in respect to security

  • revolutionary (non-liberal) securitization and morality (Holbraad and Pedersen 2012)

  • moral guilt, moral obligation, and security

  • discourse of moral responsibility in respect to security

  • securitization of national spaces and moral values

  • historically informed anthropological perspectives on the politics of in/security and its moral underpinnings

  • public morality and security

  • public/private security, security industries and moralities

  • morality and sources of fear and security

  • lived experiences, moral and ethical dilemmas in different security contexts

  • weaponizing anthropology and anthropological ‘code of ethics’


Posted: 2019-04-11

CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Extreme Anthropology


Treating Addictions 

On Failures, Harms, and Hopes of Success


Guest editors:   

Aleksandra Bartoszko VID Specialized University

Paul Christensen Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology


Addiction, recovery, and treatment are contested cultural categories shaped by medical dictates, political constraints, and moral economies – from biomedical to religious and popular conceptions of vice and morality, appropriate behavior, and ways of living. This special issue of the Journal of Extreme Anthropology aims to examine how individuals and institutions adapt or resist the concepts of addiction, recovery, and treatment across different ethnographic contexts. The issue will also interrogate addiction treatments as sociocultural institutions that increasingly represent the morally preferred solution to drug use and addiction. 


We are inviting contributions exploring questions related to contemporary addiction treatment programs from across the globe and their struggles to maintain authority or achieve their goals. We welcome papers grounded in ethnographic, anthropological, and qualitative social research, focusing on individuals’ engagements with institutional standards and principles, as well as institutional responses to failures. We are particularly interested in papers asking questions such as: How do the treatment programs maintain, deepen, and/or eradicate realities that they purport to address (such as social inequalities, stigma, or overdose)? What are the consequences for individuals struggling to realize institutionally and culturally dictated criteria of success? When and how does treatment cause harm? How do individuals who have been labeled as addicts or patients navigate their daily existence negotiating these categories? Can we imagine any other forms of inclusion of people with addiction than turning them into patients? What is at stake for the different actors involved in private and state treatment and rehabilitation industries?


Articles should be no longer than 8000 words. In addition to full-length papers, we invite alternative contributions such as photo essays, documentaries, or ethno-dramas. Please contact the editors prior to submission to discuss the proposed contribution and format possibilities.

Deadline for final papers: July 30, 2019. Authors are encouraged to contact editors before the deadline with abstract or work in progress.

All submissions should follow the journal style guidelines and be submitted here:

For any queries please contact Aleksandra Bartoszko: 



Posted: 2019-03-01
1 - 2 of 2 Items

ISSN: 2535-3241