The Compatibility of Games and Artworks

Authors

  • Michael Ridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5617/jpg.5915

Abstract

This discussion note is a response to Brock Rough’s “The Incompatibility of Games and Artworks”.  (Rough, 2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/jpg.2736

References

Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics Without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gufled, E. 2001. Chess: The Search for Mona Lisa. Batsford.

Hurka, T. (ed.) Forthcoming. Games, Sports and Play: Philosophical Essays. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Kolers, A. 2016. “The Grasshopper’s Riddle: Or, How Life is a Game.”

Nguyen, T. In progress. “Games and the Aesthetics of Agency.”

McKeever, S. and Ridge, M. 2006. Principled Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ridge, M. Forthcoming. “Playing Well with Others.” In Hurka, Forthcoming.

______. In progress. “Individuating Games.”

Rough, B. 2017. “The Incompatibility of Games and Artworks.” Journal of the Philosophy

of Games. 1: 1-21.

Suits, B. (2014) The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia, 3rd ed. (1978).

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

Discussion Notes