Me and My Avatar: Player-Character as Fictional Proxy
AbstractPlayers of videogames describe their gameplay in the first person, e.g. “I took cover behind a barricade.” Such descriptions of gameplay experiences are commonplace, but also puzzling because players are actually just pushing buttons, not engaging in the activities described by their first-person reports. According to a view defended by Robson and Meskin (2016), which we call the fictional identity view, this puzzle is solved by claiming that the player is fictionally identical with the player character. Hence, on this view, if the player-character fictionally performs an action then, fictionally, the player performs that action. However, we argue that the fictional identity view does not make sense of players' gameplay experiences and their descriptions of them. We develop an alternative account of the relationship between the player and player-character on which the player-character serves as the player's fictional proxy, and argue that this account makes better sense of the nature of videogames as interactive fictions.
K Games (2007). BioShock.
Activision (2003). Call of Duty.
Bantam Books (1979—1998). Choose Your Own Adventure.
Capcom (2009). Resident Evil 5.
Crystal Dynamics and Eidos Montreal (2013). Tomb Raider.
Dennaton Games (2012). Hotline Miami.
Galactic Cafe (2013). The Stanley Parable.
id Software (2016). Doom.
Irrational Games (2013). BioShock Infinite.
Maxis (1989). Sim City.
Naughty Dog (2007). Uncharted.
Rockstar Games (2008). Grand Theft Auto IV.
Rockstar Games (2013). Grand Theft Auto V.
Starbreeze Studios (2013). Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons.
Tactical Studies Rules, Inc. (1974). Dungeons & Dragons.
Thatgamecompany (2009). Flower.
Yager Development (2012). Spec Ops: The Line.
Baker, A. (2012). Videogames as Representational Art. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, 9(2), 28-39.
Bartel, C. (2015). Free will and moral responsibility in video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 285-293.
Carroll, N. (1990). The Philosophy of Horror. Routledge.
Carroll, N. (2001). Simulation, Emotions, and Morality. In Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press, 306-316.
Conrad, J. (1899). Heart of Darkness. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, February—April.
Garland, J. (2012). Aftermath: crossing The Line with Walt Williams. GamingBolt. Accessed on 3/27/2019. http://gamingbolt.com/aftermath-crossing-the-line-with-walt-williams
Gaut, B. (1999). Identification and Emotion in Narrative Film. In Passionate Views. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 200-216.
Gregersen, A. and Grodal, T. (2008). Embodiment and Interface. In The Video Game Theory Reader 2, Edited by Bernard Perron and Mark J.P. Wolf. Routledge, 65-83.
Hocking, C. (2007). Ludonarrative Dissonance in Bioshock. Click Nothing. Accessed on 3/27/2019. http://clicknothing.typepad.com/click_nothing/2007/10/ludonarrative-d.html
Juul, J. (2005). Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT Press.
Klevjer, R. (2012). Enter the Avatar. The phenomenology of prosthetic telepresence in computer games. In The Philosophy of Computer Games, Edited by Hallvard Fossheim, Tarjei Mandt Larsen, and John Richard Sageng. Springer, 17-38.
Lopes, D. (2010). A Philosophy of Computer Art. Routledge.
MacPherson, J. (2010). Legislative Intentionalism and Proxy Agency. Law and Philosophy, 29, 1–29.
Patridge, S. (2017). Video Games and Imaginative Identification. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(2), 181-184.
Payne, M. (2014). War Bytes: The Critique of Militainment in Spec Ops: The Line. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(4), 265-282.
Robson, J. and Meskin, A. (2016). Video Games as Self-Involving Interactive Fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(2), 165-177.
Robson, J. and Meskin, A. (2017). Still Self-Involved: A Reply to Patridge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(2), 184-187.
Schröter, F. (2016). My Avatar and Me: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Video Game Characters. In Video Games and the Mind, Edited by Bernard Perron and Felix Schröter. McFarland & Company, 32-52.
Suduiko, A. (2018). The Role of the Player in Interactive Fictions. Journal of the Philosophy of Games, 1(1), 1-17.
Tavinor, G. (2009). The Art of Videogames. Wiley-Blackwell.
Van de Mosselaer, N. (2018). Fictionally Flipping Tetrominoes? Defining the Fictionality of a Videogame Player’s Actions. Journal of the Philosophy of Games, 1(1), 1-12.
Velleman, J. D. (2008). Bodies, Selves. American Imago, 65(3), 405-426.
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press.
Wollheim, R. (1973). Imagination and Identification. In On Art and The Mind. Allen Lane, 54-83.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright in their articles and grant the Journal of the Philosophy of Games (JPG) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the following licence: Creative Commons Licence : CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The licence allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal, but does not allow others to create derivative works based on the work without the author’s permission.
- Authors are allowed to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that such distribution includes an acknowledgement of the article’s initial publication in JPG.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Authors who distribute their work after its acceptance by JPG but prior to its publication agree to indicate on the manuscript that it will be published in JPG. Authors agree that they will not publish their work in any other journals, anthologies, or monographs before the date on which their work is published by JPG.
- Authors grant JPG a royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide license to create derivative works based on their articles and to publish their articles or any part of their articles in compilations and anthologies.
In special cases, it may be possible for the author to negotiate an open licence other than the CC BY-NC-ND.