Me and My Avatar: Player-Character as Fictional Proxy

Matthew Carlson, Logan Taylor

Abstract


Players of videogames describe their gameplay in the first person, e.g. “I took cover behind a barricade.” Such descriptions of gameplay experiences are commonplace, but also puzzling because players are actually just pushing buttons, not engaging in the activities described by their first-person reports. According to a view defended by Robson and Meskin (2016), which we call the fictional identity view, this puzzle is solved by claiming that the player is fictionally identical with the player character. Hence, on this view, if the player-character fictionally performs an action then, fictionally, the player performs that action. However, we argue that the fictional identity view does not make sense of players' gameplay experiences and their descriptions of them. We develop an alternative account of the relationship between the player and player-character on which the player-character serves as the player's fictional proxy, and argue that this account makes better sense of the nature of videogames as interactive fictions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Games

K Games (2007). BioShock.

Activision (2003). Call of Duty.

Bantam Books (1979—1998). Choose Your Own Adventure.

Capcom (2009). Resident Evil 5.

Crystal Dynamics and Eidos Montreal (2013). Tomb Raider.

Dennaton Games (2012). Hotline Miami.

Galactic Cafe (2013). The Stanley Parable.

id Software (2016). Doom.

Irrational Games (2013). BioShock Infinite.

Maxis (1989). Sim City.

Naughty Dog (2007). Uncharted.

Rockstar Games (2008). Grand Theft Auto IV.

Rockstar Games (2013). Grand Theft Auto V.

Starbreeze Studios (2013). Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons.

Tactical Studies Rules, Inc. (1974). Dungeons & Dragons.

Thatgamecompany (2009). Flower.

Yager Development (2012). Spec Ops: The Line.

References

Baker, A. (2012). Videogames as Representational Art. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, 9(2), 28-39.

Bartel, C. (2015). Free will and moral responsibility in video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 285-293.

Carroll, N. (1990). The Philosophy of Horror. Routledge.

Carroll, N. (2001). Simulation, Emotions, and Morality. In Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press, 306-316.

Conrad, J. (1899). Heart of Darkness. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, February—April.

Garland, J. (2012). Aftermath: crossing The Line with Walt Williams. GamingBolt. Accessed on 3/27/2019. http://gamingbolt.com/aftermath-crossing-the-line-with-walt-williams

Gaut, B. (1999). Identification and Emotion in Narrative Film. In Passionate Views. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 200-216.

Gregersen, A. and Grodal, T. (2008). Embodiment and Interface. In The Video Game Theory Reader 2, Edited by Bernard Perron and Mark J.P. Wolf. Routledge, 65-83.

Hocking, C. (2007). Ludonarrative Dissonance in Bioshock. Click Nothing. Accessed on 3/27/2019. http://clicknothing.typepad.com/click_nothing/2007/10/ludonarrative-d.html

Juul, J. (2005). Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT Press.

Klevjer, R. (2012). Enter the Avatar. The phenomenology of prosthetic telepresence in computer games. In The Philosophy of Computer Games, Edited by Hallvard Fossheim, Tarjei Mandt Larsen, and John Richard Sageng. Springer, 17-38.

Lopes, D. (2010). A Philosophy of Computer Art. Routledge.

MacPherson, J. (2010). Legislative Intentionalism and Proxy Agency. Law and Philosophy, 29, 1–29.

Patridge, S. (2017). Video Games and Imaginative Identification. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(2), 181-184.

Payne, M. (2014). War Bytes: The Critique of Militainment in Spec Ops: The Line. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(4), 265-282.

Robson, J. and Meskin, A. (2016). Video Games as Self-Involving Interactive Fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(2), 165-177.

Robson, J. and Meskin, A. (2017). Still Self-Involved: A Reply to Patridge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(2), 184-187.

Schröter, F. (2016). My Avatar and Me: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Video Game Characters. In Video Games and the Mind, Edited by Bernard Perron and Felix Schröter. McFarland & Company, 32-52.

Suduiko, A. (2018). The Role of the Player in Interactive Fictions. Journal of the Philosophy of Games, 1(1), 1-17.

Tavinor, G. (2009). The Art of Videogames. Wiley-Blackwell.

Van de Mosselaer, N. (2018). Fictionally Flipping Tetrominoes? Defining the Fictionality of a Videogame Player’s Actions. Journal of the Philosophy of Games, 1(1), 1-12.

Velleman, J. D. (2008). Bodies, Selves. American Imago, 65(3), 405-426.

Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press.

Wollheim, R. (1973). Imagination and Identification. In On Art and The Mind. Allen Lane, 54-83.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/jpg.6230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.