Lærerarbejdet mellem konceptstyring og professionsetos - om liv og modstandsformer i skolestrukturerne
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2422Abstract
Artiklen følger tre lærere, der alle har set sig nødsaget til at revidere den lærergerning, de havde forberedt sig til. Deres møde med lokale og centrale styringsformer af skolen har begrænset anvendelsen af deres erhvervede kundskaber i et sådant omfang, at de enten har måttet revidere deres væren i erhvervet eller helt forlade det. De tre cases bearbejdes med udgangspunkt i de spændinger mellem individ og institution som E. Goffman og P. Bourdieu har undersøgt som tilpasnings- og modstandsformer. Artiklen behandler disse to spørgsmål: Under hvilke sociale betingelser bliver den hengivne identifikation med lærererhvervet til, hvad betinger ’ildsjælens’ investeringer i sit arbejde? Og hvad sker der med lærerens selvforståelse, når rummet for mulige mod
standsformer svinder ind?
Nøgleord: Lærer; modstand; afprofessionalisering; Goffman; Bourdieu
Abstract
The article follows three teachers, who have all felt pressured to revise the professional life they all had prepared for. Their encounters with local and central legal authorities responsible for school administration seem to have limited the exercise of their acquired skills to such an extent that they either have had to consider whether they are to remain in the profession or simply leave it. The three cases are analysed with focus on the tension involved in being an individual in an institutional setting. Contradictions of assimilation and resistance in the teachers’ lives are handled using the theoretical frameworks of E. Goffman and P. Bourdieu. The article deals with two questions: What kind of social conditions promote the devoted and highly enthusiastic professional teacher? And what happens to the teachers’ self-recognition when the scope of possible forms of resistance becomes restricted?
Keywords: Teacher; resistance; deprofessionalization; Goffman; Bourdieu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Content published in Acta Didactica is - unless otherwise is stated - licensed through Creative Commons License BY-NC-ND 4.0. Content can be copied, distributed and disseminated in any medium or format under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit and provide a link to the license
Non-Commercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No derivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice: No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Authors who publish in Acta Didactica accept the following conditions:
Author(s) retains copyright to the article and give Acta Didactica rights to first publication while the article is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. This license allows sharing the article for non-commercial purposes, as long as the author and first publishing place Acta Didactica are credited.
The author is free to publish and distribute the work/article after publication in Acta Didactica, as long as the journal is referred to as the first place of publication. Submissions that are under consideration for publication or accepted for publication in Acta Didactica cannot simultaneously be under consideration for publication in other journals, anthologies, monographs or the like. By submitting contributions, the author accepts that the contribution is published online in Acta Didactica.